Michy GH Rebuts Shatta Wale’s Claims of Purchasing $65,000 House and Luxury Cars

Ghanaian dancehall star Shatta Wale and his former partner, Michy GH, are once again at the center of a public disagreement following claims made by the artist regarding his financial support for his children’s mothers. During a recent appearance on the Bonah Show, Shatta Wale asserted that he had secured the well-being of his baby mamas by providing them with both housing and transportation. However, these statements were quickly met with skepticism and direct rebuttals from Michy GH, who took to social media to challenge the narrative presented by the musician. In his interview, Shatta Wale detailed his efforts to ensure a stable lifestyle for the mothers of his first two children, specifically claiming that he had purchased a house valued at $65,000 and several vehicles for their use. The artist suggested that these investments were a testament to his responsibility as a father and his desire to provide a comfortable environment for his offspring. These assertions were intended to highlight a paternal side of the dancehall artist, which has often been a topic of public interest. Michy GH, however, presented a starkly different account of the situation. Expressing her disappointment, she countered that Shatta Wale’s claims were significantly exaggerated and lacked transparency. She hinted at the existence of a $15,000 receipt that would dispute his figures and alleged that the artist has a history of reclaiming gifts he has previously given. Furthermore, Michy questioned the sincerity of buying a house for their son if the father does not visit the child at the property. She emphasized that she bears the primary financial and emotional burden of raising their son, characterizing Shatta Wale’s contributions as minimal compared to the public image he seeks to maintain. The public back-and-forth has reignited conversations regarding child support and the private dynamics of celebrity relationships in Ghana. While Shatta Wale seeks to project an image of a provider, Michy’s response highlights the complexities and potential discrepancies between public declarations and private realities. As the situation develops, it remains to be seen if Shatta Wale will provide further proof of his expenditures or if the two will find a more private way to resolve their differences regarding the upbringing of their child.